Spider-Man Homecoming Video Exposes SJW Elements
Spider-Man Homecoming
(Last Updated On: July 14, 2017)

A lot of big-budget movies lately have been adopting the multiculturalism and diversity agenda being pushed heavily in Hollywood, and one of those films is Spider-Man: Homecoming. Before going to see the movie, there’s a video floating around that discusses how much and how bad the SJWism is in the film, and whether or not it’s something that’s tolerable.

According to the YouTube channel No Bullshit, he claims that while on the surface it looks like a forced diversity crap-show, he claims that all the actors play their roles really well. He notes that Tom Holland, for the most part, is one of the only few white kids in the cast. Warning, there are spoilers discussed in the video below, so don’t watch it if you haven’t seen Spider-Man: Homecoming yet.

He further claims that all the diversity didn’t detract from the quality of the film, save for the pudgy Indian kid cast to play Peter’s arch rival, Flash Thompson. He also claims that Zendaya did a good job as Mary Jane, even though she wasn’t actually playing Mary Jane but a completely different character named Michelle. However, the hiccup in facts had the comment section absolutely livid about Zendaya playing Mary Jane Watson, even though she isn’t.

The video proceeds to talk about how there’s an actual overt scene where a black guy is given a white guy’s job in one scene, but he justifies it by saying that it was done for comedic purposes and so he was okay with that.

And while the No Bullshit channel may have been okay with the diversity and the changes, his audience most certainly was not.

Many of them called out the channel for being a traitor and an SJW in disguise, and that the channel was secretly supporting white genocide.






Some people weren’t quite as livid about the multiculturalism as others, but were just thankful that they didn’t make Spider-Man gay, as evident by the top comment in the thread.

Obviously, we know what one half of the people thought about the film, but what about the other half?

According to the comments, there were plenty of minorities defending the video, claiming that Queens in New York is actually quite diverse in real-life and that the film accurately reflects what the borough is like. Others defended the movie, but not the video, claiming that in the movie Zendaya isn’t replacing Mary Jane, and therefore it’s not blackwashing. However, some were angered that her initials were “MJ”, even though she wasn’t playing Mary Jane.

Something the comment section didn’t dwell on much was another segment near the end of the video. The video highlights a comment about the Washington Monument being built by slaves – a comment made by Zendaya’s character after she refuses to go inside. In the video he claims that the comment is played off for laughs when the teacher and the guard at the monument weren’t sure if it was actually true or not. According to the video, it was the only major SJW comment that he could remember.

No Bullshit rounds out the piece by claiming that Spider-Man: Homecoming is how multiculturalism should be depicted in film, and that the filmmakers avoided being too overt with their attempts to be Social Justice Warriors.

The channel is known for being highly anti-SJW, and he was one of the outspoken pundits against films like the 2016 Ghostbusters reboot.

Nevertheless, the channel supporting multiculturalism and diversity in Spider-Man: Homecoming did not sit well with viewers or his audience. It definitely makes you wonder if the word will spread about the SJWism in Spider-Man and affect the long-tail of its theatrical run? The blatant SJWism and media promotion of Ghostbusters (2016) was definitely enough to kill that movie dead in the water.


Ads (learn more about our advertising policies here)



About

Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years covering video games, technology and digital trends within the electronics entertainment space. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Need to get in touch? Try the Contact Page.

  • TheKnowerseeker

    If they keep cutting white people and white characters out of the media for the sake of replacing them with brown people, we’ll see if legacy media can keep profitable from only mostly-disinterested brown money (they don’t call them minorities for nothing, and brown comic book nerds are an even smaller minority) and a dwindling (I hope) pool of white cuck zombie money.

  • fenshing

    I went and saw it with my girlfriend and we really liked it. The only SJW parts was that slave one and maybe her comment about going to protest at an embassy in DC. The second one was confusing because if it was a full on SJW line she should of said she was going to protest at the White House. Still I really liked it and we did discuss the casting on the way home and for the most part we though they were all good.

  • Mike Magnum

    Frankly it felt that the producers were more interesting in casting people with the right skin color. Than actually hiring people who were the best for the part. Every time Holland was acting beside his classmate. It was plain as day that he could literally act circles around every one of them. I think this is the weakest supporting cast i have ever seen in a Spider-man movie and i think this movie suffers because of it. If they cast a wide net and the best person for the part just happened to be black or something. That would be one thing. But that doesn’t seem what happened in this movie. Are going tell me that some small dorky Indian kid was right to play the intimidating jock Flash Thompson.

    • This is probably the best comment I’ve seen out of this whole mess, and I agree. But it doesn’t matter… the parents of those kids probably brought in their nieces and nephews to give the producers a BJ in the back of their trailer.

  • Pratim Gupta

    SJW or join 4chan. how about just stfu and watch the freaking movie and enjoy it, diversity,white genocide. ITS A FREAKING SPIDERMAN MOVIE!!!!

  • Pratim Gupta

    Trying to see the new Spider-man movie, but no, here we go SJW vs 4chan. Codsy, give me a shotgun please

  • Disqusted

    Just as well I don’t care about Spiderman.

    I get the impression that there are more “extreme right” people popping up. I mean real “extreme right”, not the term the media throws around to label literally everyone. They’re either Soros plants, or real people who are more than sick of SJW nonsense. Either are just as plausible.

    I guess I don’t really care about “muh diversity” if it’s actually done well. That includes not shoehorning it or inserting subliminal message bullshit. Because if it’s done well, it wouldn’t have those issues.

  • Disqusted

    Just as well I don’t care about Spiderman.

    I get the impression that there are more “extreme right” people popping up. I mean real “extreme right”, not the term the media throws around to label literally everyone. They’re either Soros plants, or real people who are more than sick of SJW nonsense. Either are just as plausible.

    I guess I don’t really care about “muh diversity” if it’s actually done well. That includes not shoehorning it or inserting subliminal message bullshit. Because if it’s done well, it wouldn’t have those issues.

    • Adam Smith III

      If it has those issues it isn’t done well. And it does.

  • David Gray

    People looking too long into the abyss.

    They’re baying for blood regardless of whether it is warranted.
    Seeing more and more of this (running parallel with the popularity of the alt right amongst “sceptics” imo)
    I think MANY people forgot that diversity, multiculturalism and even “social justice” have never been “the enemy”
    There’s a reason for the acronym “SJW” and the W is the important part.
    The reason regressives and SJW are to be opposed IS NOT because of the ideology they claim to represent. It IS because they’re hypocrites, apply their standards inconsistently, behave reprehensibly “for the greater good” and tend to RUIN everything they advocate for.
    (example: “women should be welcome in nerd culture” is totally benign. It doesn’t even suggest men cant have some of their own spaces, only makes a vague assertion of how women should be treated. SJW however take this and suggest “nerd culture is toxic and must stop excluding women” a very different message. The former did not become less benign just because people in service to it decide to be bigots, sexists and hypocrites)

    • Cinj

      For better or worse, the pendulum is finally swinging to the opposite side. It’s to be expected that after all the crap SJW have pulled, that the backlash is going to be equally extreme. It just further proves how destructive their ideology is.

      That being said, I can’t abide by the almost apologistic nature of some of the comments being stated now. Now we’re supposed to accept shoehorned multiculturalism even if it’s not being done in an antagonistic way ala Ghostbusters or else we’re racist? Just sounds like SJWism 2.0 to me.

      As a formerly massive Spidey fan, I can’t accept sassy black non-canon Not Mary Jane and designated street shitter Flash Thompson and people can feel free to call me racist for that all they want. Have all the diversity you want but not at the expense of the existing mythology and characters. That’s where I’m coming from. If you want more blacks, Indians, women, or whatever characters then fucking create them but don’t come in and hijack existing franchises and characters for your little social experiment and then tell me I’m supposed to be okay with those changes or else I’m the one being the asshole here. Don’t mistake my nerd rage for white supremacy, you pieces of shit.

      Not directed at you, just to be clear.

      • David Gray

        No offence taken, regardless ^^

        I definitely understand your perspective
        (the asian flash is particularly strange, tbh. A weedy flash was bad enough, with Topher “Eric Foreman” Grace… >< No hate for any actor involved for taking a role, but Flash is rather iconic as a stereotypical "all American jock" to Peter's nerd. As Daniel below suggests, a black guy would have been WAY more appropriate)

        As much as I love the ACTUAL MJ (really do, redheads are like my kryptonite) I'm fine with a new character sharing the name, even if it IS intentional and silly and they really should have either committed to it or chosen a different name 😛

        I think without the general culture of "forced diversity" people would be FAR more ready to accept unconventional casting, tbh.
        SJW have simply pushed things far enough that nerds are fed up 😛

  • ShepardRahl

    “No Bullshit rounds out the piece by claiming that Spider-Man: Homecoming is how multiculturalism should be depicted in film”

    That would have been fine if these were wholly original characters, but they weren’t. They were all race swapped.

    MJ – White to black
    Liz – White to black
    Flash – White to Indian.

    This is what the people are upset about. And this whole thing about Zendaya not being MJ which everybody knew was bullshit despite Marvel/Disney insisting she wasn’t:

    “Co-screenwriter John Francis Daley confirms to Yahoo Movies that he intended Michelle to “be a reinvention” of Mary Jane. “It’s not up to us, but that’s certainly how we planted the seeds in this movie. Just to make her wholly different.”

    MJ went from a beautiful red headed woman to a scraggly haired borderline emo wanna be edge lord black girl.

    “The video highlights a comment about the Washington Monument being built by slaves – a comment made by Zendaya’s character after she refuses to go inside. In the video he claims that the comment is played off for laughs”

    No it wasn’t. There were a lot of people in the theater when I went to see it and nobody thought it was funny. I saw a lot of people, including myself, just shake their heads at the comment. I knew it was a lie. The Washington monument was built by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. Not slaves.

    • MJ went from a beautiful red headed woman to a scraggly haired borderline emo wanna be edge lord black girl.

      So we’re just going to ignore that her name is literally Michelle and not Mary Jane… or?

      • ShepardRahl

        Or what? She is Mary Jane. Different name notwithstanding. They even admitted it.

        • Except dude, her name is freaking Michelle Jones. Are you daft or what? Let me spell this out for you since you can’t seem to grasp what I’m getting at: If she’s NOT Mary Jane then they can ADD Mary Jane to the sequel. It leaves room in the universe for the real MJ.

          It’s like an idiot complaining that some guy with the initials TB who joins the Patriots is trying to replace Tom Brady. Do you follow the logic or are you blinded by your own idiocy?

          • ShepardRahl

            “Do you follow the logic or are you blinded by your own idiocy?”

            That was a bit rude. Regardless I guess we’ll just have to wait and see when they don’t add “Mary Jane” to the two sequels they have planned.

          • When people start acting like SJWs, yeah it right pisses me off. The big difference between anti-SJWs and SJWs is supposed to be that anti-SJWs use logic and sound reasoning. When people start strawmanning and using faulty logic like SJWs then what’s the point of being against SJWs when you turn into them?

          • Cinj

            Love ya Billy, but sadly I have to agree with this other fellow that you are being a bit harsh here. Another aspect of SJWs is that they insult and personally attack others who share a different opinion. What I love about the comment section of this site is that people for the most part are respectful and we’re able to civilly have a discussion, which is a rare sight on the interwebs these days. You just up and blast a dude who’s clearly on the same team and he even remained civil after you outright called him an idiot, which shows he’s an even better man than I.

            Just sayin’. *Raises flame shield*

          • You just up and blast a dude who’s clearly on the same team and he even remained civil after you outright called him an idiot, which shows he’s an even better man than I.

            I suppose you’re right.

          • You just up and blast a dude who’s clearly on the same team and he even remained civil after you outright called him an idiot, which shows he’s an even better man than I.

            I suppose you’re right.

          • Cinj

            Love ya Billy, but sadly I have to agree with this other fellow that you are being a bit harsh here. Another aspect of SJWs is that they insult and personally attack others who share a different opinion. What I love about the comment section of this site is that people for the most part are respectful and we’re able to civilly have a discussion, which is a rare sight on the interwebs these days. You just up and blast a dude who’s clearly on the same team and he even remained civil after you outright called him an idiot, which shows he’s an even better man than I.

            Just sayin’. *Raises flame shield*

          • Conner Garry Sennett

            She’s not Mary Jane. they’ve even admitted this after the movie.

          • TheKnowerseeker

            She’s a replacement! Hellooooo!

            Once again, SJWs replace a white character with a brown one in a well established story that was cannon.

    • Disqusted

      I looked up that actress and she looks so much better with her hair down and straight.

  • I’m just not gonna watch the film in cinemas, honestly. At least wait for it to be on Netflix. I remember the whole “is Zendaya Mary Jane?” bullshit happening for months, driving me fucking crazy because everyone on that fucking production was contradicting themselves. Fuck Zendaya and her stupid trolling, and fuck the team who decided calling her “MJ” for short was a good way to win over Spider-Man fans, because you certainly lost my support. I’ll just stick with Raimi’s first two films, thanks.

    Flash Thompson is not a “fat person” name, let alone an Indian name. How many Indians within the country of India can you honestly say have a surname like Thompson, a traditionally European name? I’d say less than a 1% chance you’ll find that one special Indian. And having a first name like Flash is disorienting when you can barely roll out of bed.

    Comments like “you’re supporting white genocide” just by being okay with the “diversity” in the film is pretty bloody stupid. Keep in mind the guy recorded his thoughts after watching the film, and they’re likely to change after he lets his thoughts swim around for a while. I often find that’s what happens to me.

    I get the feeling they didn’t know who to target with this film, so they decided to go all in on SJWs anyway because it’s “safe”. Kids are more red-pilled than my generation, so they’re clearly not the ones we’re looking at. They’ll never target the “true” Spider-Man fans because they’re wayciss. Teenagers, probably? They’ll probably cringe at the film later if it really tried to play itself off as a teen flick.

  • Daniel Ream

    First if all, it’s the borough of Queens, not burrow. It’s not fucking Hobbiton.

    Queens currently is very diverse, with whites only making up 45% of the population. In 1963, Queens was 92% white, so everyone Peter Parker knows being white was just reality. These days it would be unusual.

    That said, casting a pudgy desi kid as “Flash” “Thompson” is just stupid stunt casting. Flash is every dumb jock who beat up Steve Ditko in high school. Indian families are pretty well assimilated, but at home they’re still beholden to a lot of traditional ideals. They don’t marry outside of their race/culture, they don’t let their kids do sports, and their kids don’t have nicknames like “Flash” (or surnames like “Thompson”).

    Real diversity would have been making “Flash” Thompson a black kid who was the school basketball star and cocky af about it, as football hasn’t been the social sport of choice in NY schools in a long time.

    The less said about MJ the better. That’s naked pandering, akin to making Guinevere black in that godawful BBC Merlin show. It doesn’t matter that she’s not Mary Jane Watson, MJ is a fundamental part of the Spider-Man mythos. It would be like swapping Lois Lane out for “Ling Lee”, played by Lucy Liu, and saying “yeah, it’s totally not Lois Lane so that’s not SJWing”.

    • First if all, it’s the borough of Queens, not burrow. It’s not fucking Hobbiton.

      Thanks for catching that. I originally had district but changed it for some reason.

      It doesn’t matter that she’s not Mary Jane Watson, MJ is a fundamental part of the Spider-Man mythos.

      But what if she dies and the real Mary Jane is introduced?

    • Disqusted

      Spiderhobbit would be f**king amazing!

    • Disqusted

      Spiderhobbit would be f**king amazing!

    • TheKnowerseeker

      “First if all, it’s the borough of Queens, not burrow. It’s not fucking Hobbiton.” — Best laugh ever.

  • RichardGristle

    Maybe it’s that I just don’t care about comics or their movie adaptations – especially Marvel – but nothing he brought up in that video bothered me all that much. In fact, some of the things he said and the way he said them was more annoying to me than the actual SJW elements that he was referring to.

    The slave thing did seem pretty cringey though, fuck that.

  • LurkerJK

    Sounds like an anti-feminist lens making ppl crazy, im all with complaining about over-representing minorities but these complains are starting to get too nitpicky to be honest

    I havent watched the movie yet but for all i heard they got him right, i can deal with getting some of the secondary characters wrong as long as they dont go full retard

    sometimes you need to turn the lens off before you lose the ability to do so or youll start going “everything is sjwism, everything is marxism and you have to point it all out”

    • Disqusted

      I think it’s like what Suckeesian did. She intentionally presented extremist views to create objection to her bullshit, and then used it to play the victim. They do it on purpose. It’s fuel for their fire.

    • Disqusted

      I think it’s like what Suckeesian did. She intentionally presented extremist views to create objection to her bullshit, and then used it to play the victim. They do it on purpose. It’s fuel for their fire.

  • Hawk Hopper

    claims that all the diversity didn’t detract from the quality of the film, save for the pudgy Indian kid cast to play Peter’s arch rival, Flash Thompson.

    SJW Marvel didn’t have a white guy be a bully?

    • I was a little shocked at this change as well. I figured if they were going to make one character stay white, it would be the one they could point to and say “Look at the white male being oppressive! Patriarchy! REEEEE!”

      • Feli Aslan

        Its kidna insulting that they make him some betacuck Nerd. So, Indians can’t be strong Alphamales? Damn, thats fucking racist. Like, what kind of horrible person thinks this way? Its gross to be even capable of thinking that an indian men can’t be a athlete and alphamale. I really think I’m getting sick. Someone should ban this white supremacist Neo-Nazis from ruining Spiderman movies.

    • Conner Garry Sennett

      But he also isn’t that great as a bully either. He’s clearly a jerk, but never to the extremes Flash went through.

  • descent3031

    Casting decisions for superhero franchises are so fucking weird in general I’m not willing to ascribe nefarious motive to having a black actor play a character that’s traditionally white. For example, Michael Clarke Duncan was a great choice for the Kingpin because he can act and he’s so physically imposing. Kingpin’s size was much more important than his skin colour.

    Topher Grace was a bizarro, buttfuck stupid choice for Eddie Brock. I would have taken any number of actors who weren’t white but could actually play the role (Dave Bautista comes to mind, sure the character would be a bit old then.. but scary). Topher Grace as Carnage I reckon I could get behind…

    Then you’ve got the F4 reboot where they clearly made the torch black for no other reason than SJW horseshit.

    I think in general the audience is smart enough to tell the difference between blatant meddling, and thoughtful casting decisions. Or at least, they used to be. I hope this isn’t part of a trend where we do actual get upset at the race of actors just because of their race.

    • Dave Bautista or Vin Diesel as Venom would have been a gold casting choice. Dave a bit more than Vin only because he can get really scary when he gets angry, and that would really help bring the Eddie Brock side of the character to life.

      • descent3031

        I think Vin Diesel is sort of a weirdly underrated actor. I liked the whole Riddick series (yes even chronicles.. 1v1 me!), and he carried those movies.
        However, I think choosing him would have required the character to have way more screen time. Bautista is so physically imposing (and scary when he’s angry as you say) I think he could have worked with the little they gave the character.

        Actually pretty excited for Tom Hardy in the role. Wouldn’t have been my first choice, but I think he’s a good one.

      • Dave is already Drax, so the chances of him being another character in the same universe is practically zero.

        • tajlund

          Since it’s Sony and Marvel, it could have happened. There has already been some cross casting of that type. (At least planned).

    • Disqusted

      I feel like Hollywood casting decisions in general are not great.

    • Disqusted

      I feel like Hollywood casting decisions in general are not great.

  • Cinj

    What pisses me off about the movie and why I thought it was gonna be garbage long before it’s release is the amount of liberties they’ve taken with the mythos. I’m already worn out by it being yet another reboot and retelling of the Spider-Man origin, but then the fact they deviate so heavily in some hamfisted way to tie it into the MCU which didn’t necessarily NEED Spider-Man to participate just grinds my gears as someone who grew up heavily invested in Spidey. And then how they take liberties with the casting and the inclusion of non-canon characters like Michelle just so they can fulfill some diversity quota is just a bridge too far for me. This movie can be thrown into a dumpster and set on fire like much of the rest of Hollywood’s trash these days. End rant.

  • Fear Me I Am Free

    I’ve heard the movie is wonderful overall.

    Like with Zendaya. The controversy that she was Mary Jane was wrong on both sides. She’s not Mary Jane, but she is MJ. Her name is Michelle Jones with her nickname being MJ. I’d rather them do that then butcher Mary Jane Watson.

    • GuyverOne

      I’d rather they called her something else altogether, they knew what they where doing with the name and it was about making MJ a non-white character or at least that is how it appears.

      • Fear Me I Am Free

        Eh, but I’m more okay with them making her a completely different character than changing her. For all we know, in the sequel he could meet a red head named Mary Jane.

    • Disqusted

      At least they didn’t make her into a guy named Murray Johnson, or something.

      I have a bad impression of Mary Jane from the first Hollywood Spiderman movie where she (and everyone else in that film) is annoying as f**k.

      • TheKnowerseeker

        Well, to each their own, but do be aware that the Mary Jane character — as a white redhead — goes all the way back in the comics to the early 90’s, I believe, and that’s where I was first introduced to her as Peter’s love interest.

  • tajlund

    I don’t mind most of what they’ve done, what drives me crazy is the forums out there with people demanding that they either make Peter gay, or kill him off and permanently replace him with Miles Morales. (and probably make him gay).

    Also, I don’t care about the race, but what were they thinking with the casting of Flash Thompson? He’s supposed to be the stereotypical jock bully and he’s being played by a guy not much bigger than Peter?

    (Also, I can no longer comment or see comments on Firefox, not sure what’s going on).

    Also, does anyone else think it’s weird that Ned Leeds looks just like Miles Morales’ best friend Ganke? I’m having a hard time picturing this Ned becoming Hobgoblin, lol.

    • Sorry, had to compress some of the javascript on the site so comments were temporarily DOA. It should be back to normal.

      • tajlund

        Yep, all good.

    • GodBowser

      What if they start demanding that other cinematic universe heroes be killed off and replaced by cinematic universe versions of the failed SJW characters that Marvel tried to force down the public’s throat?

  • Alistair

    Where should I begun with this. Let start of Mary Jane but isn’t Mary Jane by a non white woman.

    Also the film reflect real places. According to one commentator.

    Again why does anybody either in films or video games etc etc needs force diversity down our fucking throat.

    • Mike Campbell

      Seriously what’s everybody’s problem with diversity, you just want white people and no one else as the norm

      • RichardGristle

        I live in a country (U.S.) founded, constructed, and upkept by White people. Of course I want White to be the norm. Just like Oriental people should be the norm in East Asia or black people should be the norm in Africa.

        Diversity is a meme, either way. You don’t want people and cultures to be diverse – you just want less White people in the West. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1fcc03bcb66222e9074de22ac8ae8004ed3ed7c760b1c55fbbf35ae0c1ad3a06.jpg

        • Migi

          I totally agree, Considering i don’t see ppl whining that the arab countries or some african countries are too black and need more white ppl living there so that it get’s more diverse. Most likely any white person going there is gonna get killed in the first place.

        • TheKnowerseeker

          Great meme. I wish though that the meme photo maker had replaced one of the blond heads with a black one, since many white people have black hair.

        • TheCyberZon

          Too true!

      • EroBotan

        diversity was good before you SJWs hijack it and turns it to cancer lol. Now diversity is equal to “anti white”. Just like feminism is no longer about equality but about how to destroy men.

        • Alex Chaudhari

          Am I sensing a Balkanization effect?

      • Alistair

        There nothing wrong with diversity, as there are games with diversity in them.

        Most of them are from AAA titles and beyond good and evil 2 is a good example of one.

        The issue is when you shoehorn diversity in games for the sake of it.

        You don’t see a problem with marvel changing a male Thor into a female Thor that shoehorning diversity and social justice.

        The SJWs crowd would defend the above.

      • Disqusted

        The problem is forcing diversity down everyone’s throats. It’s one of those things that occurs naturally and most normal people don’t really get up in arms about it.

        Most of us normal people don’t treat people differently because of their race or gender or sexual preferences. We eat food from diferrent countries, and appreciate all sorts of different cultures.

        The difference is having someone constantly shouting at you that you NEED to behave a specific way, and NEED to include people of every race, and MUST NOT interact or mimic with other cultures because it’s “cultural appropration”.

        Similarly, there’s a big difference between writing a good story that has people of different races, as opposed to using the story medium to push diversity. That’s why the latter tends to suck shit. Story isn’t their priority, it’s using the story to push agenda.

        Now, answer me this. If multicultural diversity is so integral, why does Western media almost always only have white and black people, and often completely ignore asian/orientals? If it was truly about diversity, they would more often have people of ALL countries. Not just judging people by skin color, and not just to avoid offending SJWs.

        • Cinj

          Just when American society has become the most tolerant and open to other cultures that I’ve ever experienced in my life, suddenly people come out of the woodwork acting as if we’re still living in the Jim Crow days and starting all this shit. Now we’re as divided as we ever were and back to not wanting to touch other cultures with a 10ft pole.

          Clearly something is afoot and the whole purpose isn’t diversity but subversion. To what end I can’t say without diving into conspiracy theory, but it’s plain as day to see there are folks who are benefitting from pushing us towards hate and division.

          • Your conspiracy theory probably isn’t far off from the truth, whatever it is.

          • Your conspiracy theory probably isn’t far off from the truth, whatever it is.

        • Cinj

          Just when American society has become the most tolerant and open to other cultures that I’ve ever experienced in my life, suddenly people come out of the woodwork acting as if we’re still living in the Jim Crow days and starting all this shit. Now we’re as divided as we ever were and back to not wanting to touch other cultures with a 10ft pole.

          Clearly something is afoot and the whole purpose isn’t diversity but subversion. To what end I can’t say without diving into conspiracy theory, but it’s plain as day to see there are folks who are benefitting from pushing us towards hate and division.

  • Gorgon

    I saw the movie, didn’t see any real SJWisms. There’s a quick joke about whether Washington Monument was built by slaves, but it was played for laughs, so it wasn’t really cringy. If anything, the movie does not make any distinction along racial lines at all, nobody mentioned races or genders, it is a completely egalitarian movie and it does not draw any attention to that whatsoever.
    I’d say any SJW shit you notice in this movie is entirely your own confirmation bias.

    • Cinj

      I don’t know which is worse: that there are writers that think bringing up slavery for no good reason other than shoving their unwanted sociopolitical commentary down your throat is what passes for a joke these days, or that there are people that actually find it humorous.

      • Gorgon

        As I took it, the joke was that Michelle likes to screw with people and the teacher didn’t know how to respond to that comment without implicating himself one way or the other. You shouldn’t take this kind of stuff so seriously.

    • Disqusted

      I think it says a lot that everyone is on the lookout for SJW shit because it has gotten everywhere and into everything, like sand.

      • Gorgon

        Yeah. It’s disturbing that any non-white casting choice is now seems to be under question because of identity politics. People used to not care about that and just enjoy the movies/games. In their quest to stop racism, SJWs may have created many more actual racists.

        • GodBowser

          If some crackpot SJW’s start saying that if you don’t like this movie your a racist would Sony jump on that band wagon like they did with the whole if you don’t like Failbusters your a sexist

        • Maybe that was their intentions all along?

  • Mike Campbell

    The people in the comment section are no different than the sjws

    • Alistair

      Why you say that, as you are one. It does not reflect that it isn’t a SJW blowout film because it clearly is one.

      So if I say I won’t watch it makes me one of them.

      Don’t make me laugh.

    • Disqusted

      They’re different in that SJWs probably created them.