War Of Rights Gains New Video Showing Alpha Gameplay
(Last Updated On: July 24, 2017)

War of Rights is in an alpha state right now, but that doesn’t stop the devs from posting new videos of the 1862 first-person shooter game. Recently, the developers published a new series called “George’s Corner” that dives into unscripted gameplay for viewers to watch. War of Rights is slated to debut sometime soon for PC via Steam Early Access.

Hosted by Campfire Games Historical Advisor, George Crecy, the new series that publisher and developer Campfire Games will be hosting every Saturday at 8 P.M. EST features an unscripted look at the state of War of Rights alpha build.

The show is said to be centered around skirmish matches on the “WoR NA 1 Skirmishes” server with general social talks as well as tactics discussions on the “WoR NA 5 & 6 Union/CSA Drill Camp” servers before and after a match.

The host, Crecy, will be using the WIP cinematic spectator camera during battles to give viewers the best possible coverage of the action, which is featured in the first ever battle episode in the George’s Corner video below.

Before jumping into the video, sprinkled throughout the gameplay, historical facts will be present detailing what happened during that time and place. The video freshly published by War of Rights takes a look at the engagement at Bloody Lane.

If you don’t know, the developers behind War of Rights had to rewrite a lot of the code to upgrade the engine from CryEngine 3 to CryEngine 5, which consumes quite a bit of development time on other aspects of the game. Moreover, the 1862 FPS title is shaping up quite well given that it is an indie game in an alpha state.

If the devs can fix up the animations and characters in certain areas, they would have a really nice alpha build on their hands. However, I expect the beta version of War of Rights to address many problems present in the Alpha, which the full game should bring an even more polished version.

You can learn more about War of Rights by hitting up its Steam Early Access page or warofrights.com.


Ads (learn more about our advertising policies here)



About

Ethan was born in glitches, and pursues to find the most game breaking glitches in games. If you need to get in touch use the Contact Page.

  • Phasmatis75

    Cool a bunch of retarded devs who couldn’t bother to even read the Wikipedia page or do any research into the actual cause of the civil war. Most telling by that American flag with 50 stars on it. We didn’t have 50 states until 1959 when Hawaii joined the union.

    • Cool a bunch of retarded devs who couldn’t bother to even read the Wikipedia page

      This game wouldn’t even be worth writing about if they based anything off of what’s written on that SJW sh*thole Wikipedia.

      • Phasmatis75

        That’s my point, even the SJW wikipedia article says the civil war had nothing to do with slavery. It was ports, illegal election of Lincoln (that’s a fun read), and economic reason that brought on the civil war.

      • Dunnlang

        All you need to do is read the Texas declaration of cessation. In their own words they describe exactly why slavery and blacks were their reasons for entering the war. Add to that it was a non-elected body of wealthy land owners that ran Texan hero Sam Houston out of office and plunged Texas into the Civil War.

        “War of rights” is pure revisionist history drivel. Simply ask yourself, “States rights to what?” The people of the time tell you in no uncertain terms it was their rights to hold slaves.

        • Heh, I have no idea how your comment relates to my statement about Wikipedia being a propaganda machine for Social Justice Warriors.

          • Dunnlang

            The point is why trust any reporting of the past, be it Wikipedia or word of mouth, when one can take 5 minutes to find out? The title of this game should be just as offensive as if it were called “White males are bad and should feel bad.” I’m just constantly disappointed that this title gets a pass where other manipulative social movements get called to account. Our nation’s history has been hijacked and sold back to the populace under a completely false narrative to line modern pockets and serve modern politicians. There should be some mention when it’s as blatant as this title.

          • The point is why trust any reporting of the past, be it Wikipedia or word of mouth, when one can take 5 minutes to find out?

            I’ve never contended that second-hand reporting was trustworthy, though. Simply that the game wouldn’t be worth reporting on if it did rely solely on Wikipedia for its facts.

            The title of this game should be just as offensive as if it were called “White males are bad and should feel bad.”

            Who said it was offensive?

            I’m just constantly disappointed that this title gets a pass where other manipulative social movements get called to account.

            What makes it manipulative and how is it getting a pass?

            Our nation’s history has been hijacked and sold back to the populace under a completely false narrative to line modern pockets and serve modern politicians.

            There’s a lot of conspiracies that pass through these comment sections, so which one are you talking about exactly in regards to the history being hijacked? That slavery in America wasn’t that bad and was mostly the fault of African slave traders? That the rest of the world’s slave trade is being underplayed by America’s history to promote white guilt?

            You’re being a bit ambiguous here.