The Culling Community Turns Against Devs Following Balance Patches
(Last Updated On: June 5, 2016)

If you’ve been playing the Early Access release of The Culling — a multiplayer-only Battle Royale or Hunger Games inspired survival title from Xaviant Games — then you might have noticed a sharp drop-off in the player base, and a brisk increase in the complaints and disgruntlement from gamers on both the forums and in the user reviews.

The team recently patched the game to add a Showdown arena, where players attempting to team up in the 16-player free-for-all mode will have to face off against each other in a designated arena or risk the penalty of death. The free-for-all mode is supposed to be about individual survival, where-as the team mode is supposed to be about tag-teaming with someone to work towards victory.

The Showdown mode was completely overshadowed in the patch notes on Steam, where users took the time out to completely assail Xaviant’s decisions with The Culling, especially regarding balancing the combat and the rock-paper-scissors setup that it used to have.

Players piled into the update to complain about how the patches are actually ruining The Culling. LouS didn’t coddle the devs with words of flattery, simply writing…

“You know what I am actually done with this game forever after that patch You guys are loosing players day by day because of those shitty patches.”

Codeur Chanis wanted to get try to get people to enact refunds even after the two hour play period has been expired, writing…

“Guys we need to ask for a refunds This game is shit the developer fucked the game up! even if you have more than 2 hours of game we need to do something about it there is a lot of good game in the steam store and they deserve our money not this bullshit of the culling”

Aaron_PK also mentioned a similar thing – another comment amongst hundreds repeating how dissatisfied the community has become with the product – writing…

“Your game’s gone to shit. Blocking doesn’t work. Getting killed in 1 or 2 hits from backstabs. Loot spawning a minute after you check the locker. I can’t believe I got this game and suggested my friends get it. No new maps, no new game modes, only 1-2 new items. It seems the only thing you’ve done since the game came out is balancing which was better back when the game was new. It’s less balanced now than ever. The game is dead because you didn’t listen to people or fix anything.”

Some individuals in the forums have stated that the people complaining about the combat becoming less fun after the balance patches just don’t know how to play. Others have defended the developers, saying that only a small minority of individuals are complaining and that Xaviant is on the right track with The Culling.

However, if you look at the recent reviews from those who have purchased the game, they rank up in the thousands. As indicated in the image below.

So what happened recently? The balance patches.

According to Steam user Silent Artemis, every time Xavient attempts to fix the combat they break it…

“I loved the Culling when it first game out. Sure, there were a few bugs, a few kinks here and there, but it was a solid game. Then, they ♥♥♥♥ed up, and kept on ♥♥♥♥ing up trying to appease anybody while ♥♥♥♥ing over everybody.”

Merdok, amongst thousands of others, says the same thing, going into a lengthy post about some of the issues with combat and melee that have become unbalanced in Xaviant’s attempt to balance the game, writing…

“I really enjoyed this game when it first came out, but this is one of those unfortunate victims of developers losing all control of their vision. Every patch has made this game worse.”

Ze Detective claims to be one of the early adopters of the game, but eventually gave up after 44 hours, citing the constant patches that made the game less fun, writing…

“Was a great game at launch and then they keep releasing patches that ruin it. Used to play with one of my friends and we try out every patch and it gets worse and worse. But people say its getting better and better and those people give me cancer.”

But is the game really less optimized and less fun than before? According to Xaviant Games, every patch has been designed to improve the overall playability. Over on their official website , they explain that they’re hoping to improve the netcode and input responsiveness to further improve playability, writing…

“Our approach to combat netcode relies heavily on client prediction to allow for the smoothest, most responsive experience possible. When you press a button, your client expects those things to happen when those inputs reach the server, and will start playing animations in anticipation.


“The underlying netcode has been modified to favor accuracy over input responsiveness (subject to further iteration, of course). Most players should hopefully not notice a huge impact on their play, but blocking may end up feeling more sluggish for players with higher pings.”

The patch notes over the past couple of months since the game released in February hasn’t done much to curb the complaints on the Steam forums, as threads regularly pop-up with players citing their reasons for “leaving the game”, while others claim they are “about fed up” with the direction The Culling has taken. Others are simply curious what happened to the game being fun and smooth when it came to the combat.

While thousands of negative reviews popping up recently and the forums being filled with complaints could be considered a mere drop in the bucket compared to the overall player base, the reality is that there is a literal drop-off in the player base. In fact, within the last 30 days, the game has lost 73% of its daily active players since going live in February, which is not a good sign for a game that’s supposed to be growing its player base leading up to its release in 2017. You can check out the stats below from

Despite having more than 460,000 owners, the Steam Spy stats also seem to back up what the Steam Charts are showing: that the player drop-off rate is accelerating.

Within the last couple of months – after peaking at 242,000 players at the end of March – the Steam Spy stats show that the drop-off has been significant, with the active player count diving down to 82,000 as of June 3rd, 2016. The drop-off rate seems to be consistent with the release of patches where the community felt it made the game worse.

While overall ownership is increasing, the active player base appears to be decreasing, which is a death knell for a multiplayer online game.

It’s easy to dismiss claims about developers not listening to their community or a fringe few being a loud vocal minority, but they’ve essentially seen their total active player count drop by 34% between March 28th and June 3rd. Combined with lower daily active users and the dissent being made consistent and apparent on the forums, along with the growing collection of negative user reviews, hopefully Xaviant Games is taking note.

The developers really should be looking into not only growing the game for its big release in 2017, but also considering what made The Culling’s so popular when it released onto Early Access back in February. Seeing double digit drop-offs each month is not going to help with the long-term sales of the game, nor will it help grow the community, especially when a game like The Culling is so dependent on maintaining a strong multiplayer community in order to function.

You can learn more about the multiplayer survival by visiting the Steam store page or by visiting the official website.

(Main image courtesy of Traqueia Toracica)

Ads (learn more about our advertising policies here)


Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years covering video games, technology and digital trends within the electronics entertainment space. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Need to get in touch? Try the Contact Page.

  • C G Saturation

    Not really familiar with The Culling, but they either have terrible people on balancing/testing, or are listening to and making changes for the wrong people.

    If you’re balancing a game, you shouldn’t try to address every single person’s complaints, because a lot of people have no idea what they’re talking about. You should only listen to players who meet a certain profile, such as having played a long time, or having somehow proved themselves as knowledgeable.

    • On the other hand, if a LOT of people are unhappy with your game for legitimate reasons, then you’re probably doing something wrong.

      Listening to the wrong people can be very dangerous. But beyond all else, once you see the numbers start to drop it’s no longer about listening to the “right” people, it’s simply a matter of getting the game back to the point where it maintained a consistent and healthy DAU base. Otherwise constantly trying to “improve” the game to meet the standards of people who aren’t playing the game is just going to further drive away the people who are playing the game.

      In this case, it kind of looks like they’re trying to improve the game to attract people who aren’t even playing it, and have no interest in playing it.

      • LurkerJK

        This is an inherent risk of Early Access, either you are an arrogant prick that listen to no one pursuing his unique vision and actually finish the product or you listen to everyone giving you contradicting feedback and go insane

      • C G Saturation

        I wish assholes would stop trying to attract customers who don’t want to buy their shitty product. While pooping all over their fanbase. Greedy as hell.

  • scemar

    balance has got to be one of the most under appreciated but difficult aspects, and important aspects, of game design

    • C G Saturation

      Discussed this previously with others, and we agreed that game design is often underappreciated, despite being one of the most important aspects of a game.

      • The thing about narrative is that during today’s generation too many games construct gameplay around narrative, which is idiotic to the 10th degree.

        They should build fun gameplay mechanics and then try to write a decent narrative around that. Always work to the game’s strengths as opposed to limiting the game to the creative narrative of the writer.

        I think that was one of the things I found somewhat disconcerting about Uncharted 4… a lot of the gameplay was centered around narrative, when in reality they should have focused more on having fun gameplay mechanics for the sake of having fun gameplay. I think that was biggest difference between Uncharted 3 and 4.

        • C G Saturation

          Agreed. A friend was telling me that Uncharted 2 (and 3?) had many moving setpieces, which made things much more exciting. He said Uncharted 4 doesn’t have any.

          I can’t really comment because every time I try to start the Uncharted series I get bored to death at the start of 1.

      • LurkerJK

        I have been wondering wtf is it with the obsession about narrative for a while, not just from devs, from reviewers and gamers, why does everything need a story ? focus on gameplay seems to get further and further away from priority each day

        The Doom reviews were particularly entertaining, everyone playing it says its super awesome, everyone reviewing it “bah, story is barebones, meh”

        • C G Saturation

          Exactly. Back in MY day, if a game didn’t seem to have a story, I made one up.

          People have no imagination nowadays. They have zero imagination/creativity and need to be hand-held and walked through the full details. There’s no room for critical thinking. Gotta explain everything in an obvious fashion.

          I like to use the Mario platformers as an example of something not really needing a realistic story. A plumber grows big from eating mushrooms, jumps on turtles, spins their shells, rides dinos and burns in lava, all to save a princess. It makes no logical sense. And it doesn’t have to. The Mario universe is still viable and believable.

          Dark Souls is another good example. There’s a narrative, but it’s barely there, and you don’t need even need to waste your time following it. A far cry from so many games nowadays that are literally built around the story.

          This all reminds me of a court case about violence a long while back, where they were trying to determine if Resident Evil 1’s story was made around the game, or the game was made around the story. Strangely, I can’t find any articles about that anymore.

          On a related note, I realized a while ago that raising kids with something like Doraemon helps to broaden their minds and allow them to think outside of the box. I dunno about other people, but I didn’t really have anything like Doraemon around me when I grew up, and now I have difficulty creating elements that aren’t solidly grounded in reality.