The Guardian, Huffington Post Colluded With Clinton Against Bernie Sanders
(Last Updated On: October 22, 2016)

More Podesta e-mails have been revealed, showing that The Huffington Post’s Elianne Ramos and The Guardian’s Jessica Valenti, amongst others, colluded with the Clinton presidential campaign to run hit-pieces against Bernie Sanders.

Wikileaks posted up additional e-mails showing collusion between the media and Clinton’s campaign, revealing that nothing in this presidential race has been even, fair or reported to the general public based on an unbiased narrative.

Lauren Peterson, Hillary Clinton’s speechwriter for the Hillary of America campaign, sent out an e-mail notifying the campaign about how well the hit-pieces were hitting home against Sanders and highlighted some of what they had in the pipeline against the Clinton opponent, writing in an e-mail dated January 20th, 2016…

“[…] this is one of the first Bernie hits that seems to really be resonating and picking up traction online.”

“Here’s our quick rundown of what is in the works in digital and digital comms land right now, keeping in mind that we are trying to do a few bigger campaign things (such as amplifying any remarks the candidate makes) and possibly sending an email, while also working with HRC, Planned Parenthood, and people who can help push this behind the scenes without our fingerprints.

“Working with bloggers and columnists to write about this from a racial justice and reproductive rights perspective, including a few people who joined us on a call to talk about the “Bernie Backlash” that was unfolding even before his remarks last night—current list is Elianne Ramos, Jessica Valenti (who is writing a column on this as we speak), Jamil Smith, Sady Doyle, Aminatou Sow, Gabe Ortiz, and others”

Unsurprisingly enough, in August of 2016 NBC reported that Elianne Ramos from the Huffington Post had joined Hillary’s campaign.

The media has consistently run stories claiming that there are conspiracy theories about them colluding with Clinton, but in the Podesta leaks there is literal admission of collusion between specific left-leaning outlets and the Clinton campaign.

On October 19th, 2016 Robert J. Samuelson from The Washington Post wrote an article saying “There’s no media conspiracy against Trump”, decrying people who say that the media is colluding with Clinton.

On October 21st, 2016 Desert News published an article by Chandra Johnson titled “Is Trump’s conspiracy narrative on the media dangerous?”, making an argument that all the facts coming out showing collusion is somehow a fabrication and illusion led on by Trump and his supporters.

Like clockwork, additional media outlets have continued to come out attacking Trump and American citizens for being completely fed up with the media’s undeniably obvious bias. Even Sanders’ supporters came under fire from the media during the “Bernie Bros” hit-pieces aimed at discrediting the candidate on the basis of his supporters being “toxic”, and even conflating Sanders with #GamerGate.

This news about collusion is nothing new, though. Throughout the Wikileaks barrage we’ve learned that Politico has colluded with the Clinton campaign, that CNN and the Associated Press have colluded with the Clinton campaign, and that there have been splinter groups paid by Hillary of America to incite violence and increase racial tensions at Trump’s rallies. The DNC e-mails also showed that they had rigged the Democratic National Convention to ensure that Sanders would not win and that Clinton would cinch the nomination. None of this is conjecture, confoundment or conspiracy… it’s literal, actual, evident fact.

Ads (learn more about our advertising policies here)


Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years covering video games, technology and digital trends within the electronics entertainment space. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Need to get in touch? Try the Contact Page.

  • LissonGrove

    This is no different to what every politician does. We see Trump doing the same, it’s not even a secret. Trump goes on Fox all the time because they fawn over him. He actually said in one of the debates that people should factcheck something he said with Sean Hannitty as he was the only witness.

    So this article is in a hysteria about very commonplace news that we all know. ON the other hand, Trump seems to have made a career out of assaulting women. He’s an awful pervert and makes Clinton look like a saint.

    • He’s an awful pervert and makes Clinton look like a saint.

      So you think breaking multiple FEC laws and paying people to cause disruptions and riots (in which case several people, including police officers, were injured), rigging the Primaries so Sanders would lose, and taking money from ACTUAL misogynists to fund the Clinton Foundation (according to the Wikileaks e-mails) makes Clinton look like a saint in comparison to Trump being a dumba$$ perv? Are you even being serious right now?

  • Starwind Evensong

    For those who don’t know, “bloggers and columnists” write OPINION pieces and are certainly well within their rights to share their opinions – just as this “Angry Gamer” has done. How about a piece on those agencies and individuals who colluded with Donald J. Trump? Fox News? Hannity? Limbaugh? Town Hall? Conservative News? People side with whatever opinion they prefer, seeing the world through the lens of their own bias.

    • That’s actually a fair point about opinion pieces and their right to them. It’s also fair for them to reach out to Clinton’s campaign for quotes or questions of veracity. Anyone doing a piece about something vital where they would like input from the original source or an authority usually reaches out for comment.

      However, in this case, this is not just reaching out for comment… this is collaborating in secret with the campaign to run negative hit-pieces against an opposing party, and doing so under the guise of neutrality. In any of the pieces you’ve read from The Guardian, Politico or the Huffington Post, did they disclose at the top that they are friends with, financially funding or politically associated with the Clinton campaign?

      If so, then it’s all good. If not, then the articles are being published under misleading terms.

      As for Trump… if there are e-mails available showing collusion, be sure that we will cover it. We don’t just cover political news we cover corruption, so if Wikileaks have some e-mails showing Fox colluding in private with Trump then we can do a story about that.

  • C G Saturation

    On top of Hillary already knowing she was going to be the nominee way ahead of time, even picking her VP early. So much for us having a choice, eh? Placating masses 101: perpetuate the illusion that what they do matters.

    People used to mock me for doubting the legitimacy of the U.S. election process. I am very much vindicated now.

    • People used to mock Alex Jones / Infowars by labelling him a “crazy conspiracy theorist” for years.

      Funny how most of the things he’s said before is actually being revealed to be true.

  • This heartens me. Not just the article, but the comments. We seem to be seeing the formation of a fully jaded, hard Left blowback against the Institutional Liberal Establishment and its unrelenting political correctness, war-mongering overseas violence, and utter cluelessness regarding its role in the corrosion of the society.

    It won’t come to much for a while, but by 2020, we might see enough frustration to fuel real political fury, the kind that gets accused of anarchism, terrorism, and all manner of other scorn from the mainstream media.

    That means we have the ingredients for the clash of a real antithesis against the miserable thesis, and so may come the genuine revolution.

    Someday. Maybe soon.

  • Well, the Guardian has become an SJW, pro-feminist “KILL ALL MEN BECAUSE THEY’RE TO BLAME FOR EVERYTHING” clickbait site in the last year or so…

  • Corrupt to the bone marrow.

    November 8th is going to be wild.