Google Fires James Damore For Writing Anti-SJW Manifesto
Google CEO
(Last Updated On: September 19, 2017)

[Disclosure: The following article contains a paid promotional link]

An engineer at Google named James Damore was fired recently for penning a 10-page, 3,000 word manifesto breaking down how Google’s SJW policies could harm the company in the long run. The manifesto pointed out the differences between men and women and how it translates into the workplace, and offered solutions on how to better integrate women without focusing so much on utilizing Leftist principles to suppress Conservative or Right-leaning viewpoints while also unfairly focusing programs and initiatives on minorities and women.

The memo was not well received by Google’s executives, and Social Justice Warriors called for the engineer to be fired, so Google’s Indian American CEO, Pichai Sundararajan (pictured above), penned a letter to the Google employees letting them know that the employee had been fired.

Re/code posted Sundararajan’s letter in full, where he explains…

“First, let me say that we strongly support the right of Googlers to express themselves, and much of what was in that memo is fair to debate, regardless of whether a vast majority of Googlers disagree with it. However, portions of the memo violate our Code of Conduct and cross the line by advancing harmful gender stereotypes in our workplace. Our job is to build great products for users that make a difference in their lives. To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK. It is contrary to our basic values and our Code of Conduct, which expects “each Googler to do their utmost to create a workplace culture that is free of harassment, intimidation, bias and unlawful discrimination.”

Part of the memo explicitly pointed out that those who did not adopt to the Leftist SJW mindset were being discriminated against at Google, and that the reason the memo originally was passed around anonymously was because anyone who openly discussed it would be fired.

A witch hunt took place to discover the identity of the employee so that he could be fired.

When the identity of the engineer was discovered, Google fired him for not adopting the Regressive Left’s SJW mindset.

Sundararajan further went on to write…

“At the same time, there are co-workers who are questioning whether they can safely express their views in the workplace (especially those with a minority viewpoint). They too feel under threat, and that is also not OK. People must feel free to express dissent. So to be clear again, many points raised in the memo — such as the portions criticizing Google’s trainings, questioning the role of ideology in the workplace, and debating whether programs for women and underserved groups are sufficiently open to all — are important topics. The author had a right to express their views on those topics — we encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.”

Amazingly, the engineer stated that many people within Google feared publicly expressing their opinions because Google would take action against them for having these discussions, almost like bookies taking action against someone with a gambling addiction attempting to take advantage of a no deposit casino bonus in Canada while their credit limit is maxed.

While Sundararajan states that they should have discussions without taking actions against people, they explicitly did take action against the engineer for bringing up the topic.

Originally Sundararajan didn’t want to speak out if the engineer had been fired or not, but the engineer confirmed to Bloomberg that he had indeed been fired by Google, which proved the point of the anti-SJW manifesto: that dissenting opinions would get you fired and ostracized from the company.

In the letter to Bloomberg, the engineer revealed that he was fired for violating Google’s Code of Conduct and for perpetuating “gender stereotypes.”

This ideologically-driven reasoning for firing the employee was precisely what was mentioned in the manifesto as being the sort of thin-iced sociopolitical policies employed at Google that have caused many employees to stay silent about their political leanings or avoid speaking openly or honestly, lest they get fired or potentially blacklisted by the social justice circles that dominate Silicon Valley.


Ads (learn more about our advertising policies here)



About

Billy has been rustling Jimmies for years covering video games, technology and digital trends within the electronics entertainment space. The GJP cried and their tears became his milkshake. Need to get in touch? Try the Contact Page.

  • Squidz Mackenzie
  • Kiryu

    I just seen that the employee is considering legal action against Google.

    • Disqusted

      Me too.

  • Aura7541

    I hope he finds a job either at Gab or Minds. I read through his manifesto and it’s sickening how the media grossly misrepresented his opinions. Google’s firing of Damore basically confirmed his statements as the company demonstrated that they do not stand for ideological diversity. They are deeply rooted in identity politics and could care less about the merits of good ideas.

  • Mooki

    comon people, we all know that objective truth is racist and scares people and so should be banned from workplaces and everywhere else

    ‘College Students Claim Objective ‘Truth’ Is A Racist ‘Myth’
    http://www.dailywire.com/news/15504/college-students-say-truth-racist-myth-amanda-prestigiacomo#exit-modal

    That’s right people, Objective truth is …..a Myth…. (dem extra chromosomes man)
    And racist too.

  • durka durka

    “whether they can safely express their views in the workplace (especially those with a minority viewpoint)”

    Then they talk about diversity how can you be diverse when you all agree with yourselves and have nothing to question our beliefs about? Thats an echochamber.

    “In the letter to Bloomberg, the engineer revealed that he was fired for
    violating Google’s Code of Conduct and for perpetuating “gender
    stereotypes.””

    Funny coming from an organization that pushes feminism “women are weak and pathetic” narrative down everyones throats.

    Oh well they couldnt get him for being a white man, so they got him for being sexist. Kinda remnids you the communist regimes that if you dissagreed they will always find something on you, like drugs in your car or something.

    Speaking of which i was unaware what “Defend europe” is and how Lauren Southern is involded with it. The media covered it as the exact opposite of what it was about, they claimed they were smuggling refugees, needless to say journos all over the world copied those articles without doing any ressearch.

  • Fear Me I Am Free

    Really hope Google gets sued for this.

    • Kiryu

      They fully deserve to be sued,the man was fired based on his beliefs.

  • PizzaWolf

    They prove themselves to be hypocrites over, and over again. They are not for tolerance or diversity. It’s about bullying and conformity, wrong thinkers like this unfortunate man are shouted down and hunted. They found him rather quickly didn’t they? I imagine they used all their might to locate and punish this man for the crime of disagreement.

  • I know they would get rid of someone who has the right to speak up to us about what’s been going on. If he did the opposite thing that favors the Left, then he obviously wouldn’t get fired at all.

    This is the type of shit would’ve caused an outrage among a good amount of people who would’ve gotten their unconcerned heads out of their booties while knowing that the company giants, like Google, favors to the easily offended Left. When that outrage happens, then people will most likely condemn Google for firing a man for speaking up about what he’s been aware of and how he feels that it would not benefit the company’s well-being with those who have different political beliefs.

    Seeing this shit happening also gives me the thought that this really violates the benefits of free speech real hard. All because he wrote a memo that made the offended feel “threatened” about it, which is pretty dumb.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1a3a5da952e96c4a15af4b79aa95c31779258aff1b727a189f144b92fbcf2909.gif

  • GuyGuysonEsquire

    Google CEO – the most punchable face of 2017.

  • GuyGuysonEsquire

    Google CEO – the most punchable face of 2017.

    • Disqusted
      • GuyGuysonEsquire

        Not bad, but Sundararajan’s smug mug is painful to look at to me, same as Sarkeesian.

        • Disqusted

          Ugh, Suckeesian burns my eyes and soul.

      • RichardGristle

        Yeah Cuckerberg has always sat atop my punchable face list since the first time I had to look at him. Fuck I hope he gets hit by a meteor.

        • Disqusted

          He often looks like a f**king android. You can totally imagine his head unscrewing and coming off.

      • A post showed up in my FB feed last week that advocated violence against white people because of “colonialism.” After reporting it, Facebook’s review team said it did not violate their rules. Hilarious.

        • Disqusted

          Yeah, I hear they do that a lot. There are FB communities called “KILL ALL WHITES” or something, and FB won’t do anything about them, claiming they don’t violate FB’s rules.

          Meanwhile there are apparently lots of people claiming that blacks cannot be racist, or something. That’s what I meant by they’re literally redefining what words actually mean. The sad part is most people don’t seem to notice.

          • Mr.Towel

            Heh, I think even Anita says blacks can’t be racist (or women can’t be sexist), because she defines racism (or sexism) as:

            Prejudice + Power

            So if you’re a bigot but you don’t have “Power” (aka, you’re a minority) you can’t be racist/sexist… in their warped world view at least.

            Curiously, this definition seems to disappear when you’re a minority and a shitposter. Screw me, I guess.

    • Disqusted
  • Hopefully this will lead to disillusioned Google employees leaking out details about the diversity programs and sensitivity training. I’d very much like to see if the training is skewed or even based in fact.

  • Hopefully this will lead to disillusioned Google employees leaking out details about the diversity programs and sensitivity training. I’d very much like to see if the training is skewed or even based in fact.

    • Mr.Towel

      Considering how unself aware they are, maybe even the SJW themselves will start to reveal this shit as a way to virtue signal about how google is forward thinking and modern while they don’t perceive all the bullshit they are revealing.

  • Keystone

    Love how they proved his point beyond a reasonable doubt. GJ Google.

  • Keystone

    Love how they proved his point beyond a reasonable doubt. GJ Google.

    • Disqusted

      You know what the scariest part about this is? They just full-on legitimized and encouraged firing anyone who dares express wrongthink. They’ve essentially handed SJWs a loaded gun.

      I’d expect a shitton more people to suddenly go byebye for stupid reasons. Probably all white males can kiss their Google jobs goodbye.

      • Keystone

        People who will, hopefully, go work for places that are alternatives to Google and provide real competition. Probably being optimistic there, but hey who knows.

        • Disqusted

          Assuming the big SJW corporations don’t buy them out too. This is probably why Japan was smart enough to get rid of their zaibatsu/conglomerate company shit, where everything is owned by the same few assholes.

        • Disqusted

          Assuming the big SJW corporations don’t buy them out too. This is probably why Japan was smart enough to get rid of their zaibatsu/conglomerate company shit, where everything is owned by the same few assholes.

        • Ehh, it’s not so much about who is working there but what they’re doing with who they have.

          You need forward thinking technocratic pioneers, otherwise you could have the smartest guys in the room and still churn out crap-tier product under piss poor leadership… sort of like Yahoo!

      • Keystone

        People who will, hopefully, go work for places that are alternatives to Google and provide real competition. Probably being optimistic there, but hey who knows.

  • Disqusted

    You cannot claim you protect freedom of speech while simultaneously firing people for stating facts that may offend precious snowflakes.

    If they’re that worried about people feeling they can’t express opinions at Google without getting punished, maybe they shoudn’t have f**king fired the guy. You can tell they just don’t give a flying f**k, and the shit they put out is nothing more than hollow, meaningless PR.

    And that’s just how they reacted to that guy’s shit. Couple that reaction with their new YouTube policy of f**king over everyone they personally don’t like, regardless of whether they violate terms of service, and only a dumb ignorant shit would still believe Google gives a shit about freedom of speech.

    I can’t tell you how many times I’ve said something and people assumed I must be generalizing. I don’t assume everyone is the same, because OBVIOUSLY they f**king aren’t. It’s the person on the receiving end that’s arbitrarily jumping to such vapid conclusions. Why should I be punished if people take what I say out of context? Maybe people should f**king learn to not be babies?

    • Disqusted

      By the way, I was talking about this with a Japanese friend. They said something like they heard it wasn’t just anti-diversity, it was more about the facts (was really tired, forgot exactly what they said).

      I said I was surprised Japanese media would report it properly, instead of just dismissing the whole thing as “anti-diversity” like the Western media did. I expected they’d just copy the Western mainstream like they did with GamerGate.

      They said they did hear something like that too, and linked me a Nico Nico article that basically quoted Vice and Gizmodo. And we all know how full of shit Vice and Gizmodo are. F**king fake news media.

      • Disqusted

        Oh yeah, speaking of fakestream media…

        I heard people are up in arms about Trump’s personal news thing, which points out the positive stuff he’s done that the media has been ignoring. I just wanted to bitch about how people’s reactions don’t make any sense, and it shows how poor their overall judgment is.

        People are saying it’s state-sponsored propaganda, but I think the whole point of propaganda is to deceive via third parties, like the mainstream media. How is it propaganda when everyone knows it’s coming from Trump himself?

        They also say it has to be propaganda because Trump news is only positive. Well, maybe if the fakestream media was DOING THEIR JOB PROPERLY and covering Trump fairly, instead of being 99% negative, Trump wouldn’t need to point out his positives, would he? Why would he cover the negatives when the fake news media is already doing that 24/7?

        And I’m saying this as someone who got smeared and slandered a lot since childhood. People kept making up negative shit about me, and I tried my best to show I was a good person and helped people, but that was all ignored. I know how difficult it is to convince people you’re not evil, once they’ve already decided you have to be.

        I also find it ironic that people think 99% negative isn’t propaganda, but a direct counter-reaction to that negativity is? And these are the same people who have a fit when people aren’t positive enough, because it hurts their feelings.

        It’s like DeFranco said, when they keep making up bullshit about Trump, it ends up making it difficult to call out Trump when he does actually do something that needs criticizing. Makes me wonder if the fakestream is actually working for Trump, but Occam’s Razor and all that.

        Anyway, I do think it’s strange the Trump news ended with “this is the real news”, considering they aren’t covering everything. They should have commented about how “funny you never hear about this stuff on the fake news” instead.

        • Mr.Towel

          By their logic, every report from the White House is propaganda since they always highlight only the good stuff they are doing. Obama was a master in this sort of thing.

          • Disqusted

            It’s like the meaning of “propaganda” has changed into “stuff we don’t like/don’t want to accept”.

            Wouldn’t be surprised if we got confirmation that Soros is intentionally destroying the English language, too. Look at how many words got turned into some subjectively offensive bullshit, and how often people bitch about English like it’s fundamentally “racist”.

          • Disqusted

            Hijacking my comment even though it’s at the bottom and probably nobody will see it.

            I just saw the comments on DeFranco’s video on this subject, and HOLY SHIT so many people are STUPID AS SHIT. They fail at basic English. Here are a bunch of common misconceptions I saw:

            – They think “races aren’t biologically equal” means “races shouldn’t be treated equally as human beings”.
            – They think “on average” or “generally” somehow means “all/everyone”, which magically equals “racist” or “sexist”.
            – They seem to think basic biology is questionable and equivalent to religious/evolutionary theory? Someone even referred to it as “biological essentialism argument”. What?
            – They’re against anything that someone MIGHT find offensive, even if they are basic facts of reality, with some going so far as to refer to facts as “violent” and “borderline serial killer assertions”.

            I guess this is what happens when most people learn a language based on how it is contextually used in social interactions, and not by what each word actually means. SJWs and mainstream media constantly using words incorrectly has resulted in widespread misinterpretation.

            There was this one guy with a suspiciously botty name who kept pasting the same bullshit comment over and over. Have to wonder if Google are sending bots out to spout bullshit. YouTube is their own platform, after all.

            Some people keep saying it’s “not political”, while failing to notice that Google’s Diversity Vice-President (who only just got the job) allegedly also worked on the Hillary Campaign. Note that she was only just hired, which implies an ongoing effort to recruit SJWs.

            The mainstream is already painting her as a victim of “harassment” because she hid her Twitter after being busted for being another Soros stooge. I’m seeing people point out she followed the Soros women’s march leader Linda Sarsour, and her LinkedIn says she led a women only initiative. How “diverse”.

            Some people also seem to think “sexism” isn’t “political”. Isn’t that the very thing that Hillary primarily campaigned on?

            I also still see people like Styx assuming that Google only cares about making a buck. If that was the case, why would they keep replacing their staff with hardcore SJWs who don’t turn anywhere near as much of a profit for the company? Unless Soros and Hillary’s backstage money is worth THAT much.

            Maybe I’m missing something, but I’m pretty sure pushing political agenda does not correlate with caring about profit. Otherwise you wouldn’t see shit like the Democrats pissing away millions just to constantly fail. Or SJW media consistently failing to sell.

            Styx also seems sure that this whole thing is a moral panic and will fade away. I’m not so sure, because even if a current incident seems similar to a past incident, there are various factors involved that may cause different results.

            Some people compare Google to companies like AOL that were huge and faded away, but I would argue that the net and social media were previously not as widely used/integrated and relied upon as they are now. I think it’s too early to be so sure of what will happen.

            There has been a long build-up of SJW brainwashing too, to the extent that children are being raised with SJW bullshit. Has this kind of thing really already happened before, on such a scale? Closest thing I can think of is Hitler Youth, or North Korea. I’m not well-versed on history though.

          • Mr.Towel

            It never happened exactly at this scale before but the concept itself isn’t new. And from what I can tell I can see it doesn’t work unless you have a totalitarian state suppressing information, as is the case for China or North Korea.

            Even if you try to indoctrinate children from very early age, if the mainstream society remains free and open to circulate information, at least 1/3 of these children will get to their rebellious stage and go exactly to the opposite direction the indoctrination is pushing them to go. If the society has free flowing information when that happens, they will naturally find other people like them, organize and grow. It doesn’t happen all that well in places like China and North Korea exactly because these states don’t permit information to flow freely, so the few children who rebel have no place to go but to fall back in line.

            As it’s happening in America right now it seems to be the opposite. They tried to indoctrinate the children by mandating SJ political points in every school’s curriculum, as they have done on Universities. But what they didn’t noticed is that for American children school is a symbol of boredom and bullshitery, not the same as college, so by including the SJ bullet points into school, Gen Z is identifying their bullet points as bullshit because school is bullshit and they are rebelling against it. Specially their anti-sex stuff against teenage boys full of hormones. It’s exactly like the puritanical right in the 80s. Their plan to indoctrinate since childhood is backfiring beautifully.

            A very similar situation happened with my generation and environmentalism. Which was a point they hammered into our heads at school, specially the “hole in the ozone layer” bullshit. Most of my generation created a distaste for this kind of rhetoric and rejected the subject. As we grew, we started to find more information about the subject which contradicted the boring bullshit at school and that got our genuine attention (like the fact that CFCs are way denser than air therefore cannot fly to the ozone layer by themselves and so on). Children are not so naive as they look, they can perceive some level of bullshittery at other’s rhetorics.

          • They think “races aren’t biologically equal” means “races shouldn’t be treated equally as human beings”.
            – They think “on average” or “generally” somehow means “all/everyone”, which magically equals “racist” or “sexist”.

            Well, remember, there are some people out there who believe that biological differences do mean that we should treat people differently. The belief that blacks are born dumber and violent has led some to the conclusion that violent tendencies requires violent responses.

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/07/22/video-austin-police-body-slam-black-teacher-tell-her-blacks-have-violent-tendencies/?utm_term=.cf1508f0d4c3

            In some cases, even when a cop plead guilty for shooting an unarmed guy in the back for fleeing a traffic stop, some didn’t think he was in the wrong:
            http://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-slager-trial-mistrial-jury-foreman-dorsey-montgomery-5-jurors-were-undecided-walter-scott-shooting/

            So yes, there are some people who think that biological differences means we should treat people differently, even more violently, in fact.

            But you’re right, the stats relate to averages not wholes. But a lot of people think of these averages as representations for “all”, not “some”. Also, a lot of people don’t want to be on the lower end of those stats, or become a victim of what those stats might mean, if that makes any sense.

            They seem to think basic biology is questionable and equivalent to religious/evolutionary theory? Someone even referred to it as “biological essentialism argument”. What?

            Right, well this is because of what was mentioned above. People are afraid that by acknowledging some research as certified fact, it means acknowledging that on average, females/minorities are perceived as sub-human.

            It was just half a century ago (within a lot of people’s lifetimes) that minorities were given equal rights. This just happened back in the 1960s. Before then, minorities really were treated as sub-human because people believed they were biologically inferior. You can imagine that when people bring up stats insinuating that a race, on average, is violent and dumb — and then there are instances where they’re treated that way — some people fear that acknowledging facts could slip society back into the pre-Civil Rights era of thinking: that minorities are sub-humans.

            For women… it’s only been less than 100 years in America since the suffrage movement culminated in the right to vote. It also wasn’t until the 1960s did women also gain a lot of societal freedoms and break cultural norms. I think some people fear that by acknowledging that there are biological differences — that women on average are dumber and less efficient than men — that it runs the risk of companies and industries using these stats as a way to move forward with their hiring practices.

            Ultimately, people are afraid that this might mean we’ll slip back in time. That women could be seen as a hiring liability, and that minorities are always going to be the least qualified for a job due to biological tendencies.

            The comments you’re reading are being written out of fear.

  • Mr.Towel

    To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not OK.

    SCIENCE IS OFFENSIVE AND NOT OK! KILL IT WITH FIRE! *REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE*

    • Kiryu

      Facts>Libtard feelings.

      • Mr.Towel

        Facts are Haram-I mean hatespeech.

    • What about school teacher jobs? You know where around 80% of teachers are women. Very few men do not get these jobs because they are automatically seen as potential ped0philes.

      This is what real discrimination is. And it’s perpetuated by the mainstream media and social pressure.

      Obviously, SJWs and feminists stay quiet about this of course.

      • Mr.Towel

        Yep. It’s pretty much any profession which involves care giving in any form.

      • Fear Me I Am Free

        The irony is some of the best teachers I ever had were male.

        • durka durka

          Are you saying that male teachers know how to get the attention of male students and get them to learn because of their gender which allows them to understand how boys behave? You sir must be a monster, please ban this neo nazi filth.

          • Fear Me I Am Free

            Oh no, the girls loved them too. In numerous grades, I had a male teacher who most loved and did a great job teaching. Not to say I didn’t have female teachers like that, but for some reason my school system had a lot of older teachers who were set in their ways and made the classes boring as hell.

      • Mooki

        Interestingly though when it comes to ped0philia its about 50/50 male/female. Meanwhile people are staring down men who said “hey there kiddo” to their kid while the woman who has been standing next to them for the past 20 minutes had been staring and “thinking ” about their kid all that time.

  • Feli Aslan

    More than anything this shows that the US needs a stronger employee protection in their Law. James Damore should totally sue his former employer.

    • He can’t sue. California is an at-will state, meaning they can fire him for just about any reason. There’s also not enough evidence (from what’s been made available) indicating that he was fired for discriminatory reasons, which he could have used to sue on the basis of the company practicing discrimination.

      • durka durka

        Isnt california the one who legalized hiring communists? Funny, all the commie countries like say venezuela have very strict labor laws. Even socialist france has very strict labor laws, very protectionist and unioninst.

        So when it comes to protecting themselves, they fire outsiders. Interesting, they managed to get neoliberalism to work for their ideology.

        • Isnt california the one who legalized hiring communists? Funny, all the commie countries like say venezuela have very strict labor laws. Even socialist france has very strict labor laws, very protectionist and unioninst.

          That’s because they’re offshoots of the original Socialist movements, which despite what people may say, really did originate around the worker rights and benefits for the proletariat. Socialism these days is a “dirty” word because Capitalists made it so, but it was always about laying the ground work for protectionism within labor markets.

          So when it comes to protecting themselves, they fire outsiders. Interesting, they managed to get neoliberalism to work for their ideology.

          At the end of the day they’re still a capitalist company, and it’s still about protectionism for the ideological zeitgeist. They don’t give a crap about the actual workers. It’s why in the manifesto Damore mentions that this sort of setup will hurt Google in the long run because SJWism doesn’t really coincide with capitalism. Eventually it will implode.

          • durka durka

            Hey hitler did alot for labor rights, but the left doesnt talk about it.

          • durka durka

            Hey hitler did alot for labor rights, but the left doesnt talk about it.

      • Disqusted
        • Even if it is, he would need staggering proof for a wrongdoing firing, otherwise the “At Will” clause is Google’s get out of jail card. They mentioned he violated their code of conduct, and unless he can prove otherwise (and he would need some extremely good lawyers to do so), it would be difficult to argue against, especially if Google churned out a few whiny Leftist SJWs to say that they felt threatened for their jobs by his memo, in which case Google would argue that they were in the right.

          But again… it all boils down to whatever proof he has and how good his lawyers are.

          • Mr.Towel

            I hope he does, even if he fails…

            I will be laughing like a schoolgirl when Google argues that they can fire anyone “At Will” and the Left will have no option but to agree with them. It will be an hypocrisy I’ll keep tabbed for decades to come.

            Edit: Also, they can inadvertently set a precedent for firing someone for their ideological beliefs, in which case they would be screwed.

            I need more popcorn.

          • durka durka

            Man how the fuck did the left go from “the corporations are evil” to “corporations are awesome” I swear that was their argument 10 years ago.

          • durka durka

            Man how the fuck did the left go from “the corporations are evil” to “corporations are awesome” I swear that was their argument 10 years ago.

          • Disqusted

            Hmm. Thanks. Man, the world sure sucks.

      • Feli Aslan

        That kinda sucks.

        • According to some reports, though, he may have a case if he can prove illegal behavior. He claims that what Google was doing was illegal. Now if he was fired and it turns out that any of his claims of illegality were true, then not only will Google have been outed for a wrongful termination but they could also be sued or charged for whatever illegal behavior they were involved in.

          Lots of hypotheticals, though. We don’t know what Damore has or if it’s enough to actually get Google to bend.

          • Feli Aslan

            Lets hope for the best.

  • george orwell

    Eppur si muove

  • Bitterbear

    Why do Tech companies love to hire foreigners? is it because it’s cheap labor? No, it’s because the locals screech like soiled toddlers whenever they’re exposed to something that conflicts with their point of view.

  • Migi

    SJW will implode on itself eventually, by hiring more stupid dumbasses for the sake of diversity. The problems is the real smart ppl like the guy that wrote the manifesto need to leave these company’s and branch out with a newer open minded kinda company.

    • Phasmatis75

      Was reading that engineer schools are screwed now too. SJWs will implode upon themselves and take western civilization with them.

      • SJWs will implode upon themselves and take western civilization with them.

        Or alternatively, SJWs won’t implode and successfully form their own totalitarian society and government, and instead we are the ones who get ostracized further and eventually die off.

        That’s the way it’s looking right now.

        Unless we can somehow counter and kick these parasites out mainstream media, news media, newspapers, academia, education, politics, government, entertainment media, Social Media, TV, Hollywood, campaigns, women’s groups, institutions, organizations, etc.? I don’t think so.

        In the United States, the only person who can realistically do this is Donald Trump. If he actually focuses more on attacking the social issues (such as the cancerous college campuses, the wage gap myth, the rape culture myth, etc.) instead of just “muh stop immigration” and “muh economy and jobs” then there’s a chance of something actually being done.

        But then also, Ivanka Trump is constantly whispering into his ear about how women in the West are still in chains and locked in cages, so I guess Trump will not be the savior as the Alt-Right and Pepe brigade thought he would be. He’s going to be a waste of time and become yet another cuck when it comes to these issues.

        • ThyPancakeConsumed

          You forgot Trump’s “muh wall mexicanos will pay for!1111”

          • Disqusted

            It’s hard to gauge what Trump’s actual intentions are because he intentionally overstates and then pulls back.

            It may be effective for garnering initial support, but it doesn’t look great in the long run if he keeps falling short of his own stated goals.

            Also makes him look like a liar. But I guess if you look at it realistically, people should expect that some things don’t turn out as intended.

          • ThyPancakeConsumed

            Trump trolled everyone with that wall statement though.

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. I mean, it always seemed kinda strange to me to expect a poorer country like Mexico to pay for the wall. I didn’t really believe it’d happen. Not that I know much about economics or anything.

          • ThyPancakeConsumed

            Unless he found way to extort drug lords “mexicanos” paying for the wall is not going to happen.

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. There’s no way drug lords are gonna go “hey, let’s wall up our own business”.

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. There’s no way drug lords are gonna go “hey, let’s wall up our own business”.

          • tajlund

            Actually he has clarified that they would pay through correction of the current trade imbalance between our countries. He unfortunately tends to speak in grand sweeping statements with no details, and people fill in the details themselves with their personal wishlists (or in the case of the left their personal prejudices). It might have worked in business, but it doesn’t work quite as well in politics. (Though it’s still preferable to people like Turkey Neck McConnell and MClame that just flat out lie.)

          • tajlund

            Actually he has clarified that they would pay through correction of the current trade imbalance between our countries. He unfortunately tends to speak in grand sweeping statements with no details, and people fill in the details themselves with their personal wishlists (or in the case of the left their personal prejudices). It might have worked in business, but it doesn’t work quite as well in politics. (Though it’s still preferable to people like Turkey Neck McConnell and MClame that just flat out lie.)

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. I mean, it always seemed kinda strange to me to expect a poorer country like Mexico to pay for the wall. I didn’t really believe it’d happen. Not that I know much about economics or anything.

        • Disqusted

          Regardless of whether Trump can be trusted or not, I think he just has too much on his plate.

          On top of having to do normal governing shit like trying to keep every damn country happy, Soros and his buddies have Trump constantly on the defensive, chipping away at him, trying to destroy and defame him. The SJWs are just one part of their bullshit.

          Soros and his buddies are like a giant kraken with a billion tentacles, and Trump’s busy trying to cut off the ones slapping him and the general populace in the face, while the SJW tentacles are on another side of the creature, smacking people in the back.

          There are so many tentacles flailing around that nobody can reach the root. They’re too busy trying to cut off the ends.

          Not a great analogy, but I imagine it’s something like that.

          • ThyPancakeConsumed

            Its actually is something like that and that’s even bigger horror than well… opinions differs as it comes to “whats the biggest horror”.

        • Alistair

          i say this doing nothing is not a option, it can and will take fucking ages just like gawker to go “poof” and it gone.

          it like we not winning but we are. youtubers are winners the left isnt.

          tell me how many gamers or they label us as the Alt right made the headlines of the following things?.

          sexual assult.

          child porn. etc etc.

          we have to keep plugging away.

        • ) instead of just “muh stop immigration” and “muh economy and jobs” then there’s a chance of something actually being done.

          Well the immigration issue and the job issue overlap into a ton of other infrastructural sectors. For instance, immigration eats into a lot of governmental aid programs when it’s abused by states like California allowing illegals to make use of social services they shouldn’t be allowed to use, putting the country billions in debt over the years handing out what’s essentially “free candy”.

          There’s also the security infrastructure of illegal immigration — they don’t want another Germany to happen. Those guys got cucked hard by Merkel. It’s slowly degenerating into a dung hole of violence and rape. They can’t let America get that bad, so it’s important to keep measures in place to keep the immigrant refuse out, especially the ones with terrorist tendencies.

          The jobs market is the backbone of America and it’s cracking pretty badly. Many of the jobs have been outsourced by big corps to Russia, China, Mexico, and South America, as it’s just cheaper to hire in foreigners willing to work without any benefits, retirement or pension plans, and for a fraction of the costs of an American worker.

          With industry and production jobs going the way the dodo in North America, they need to replace it with something. Many tech and human resource jobs are going to the Chinese and Indians, and manufacturing jobs are being eaten up by the Korean/Chinese robots.

          So yeah… within the next few generations middle-class America will be wiped out due to jobs being exported, and the country will end up collapsing in on itself if it keeps moving at its current rate.

    • Kiryu

      “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” – Napoleon

      We can just sit back and watch the left destroy itself right now.

    • durka durka

      No question man, google has been going down the drain for years and the more they keep hiring commies who are weak worthless and stupid, the worse it will get, then the stock holders will take notice. This is how it always ends with socialists, they dont produce anything, so in the end they end up importing sand in the desert because they only waste resources and dont produce anyrthing.

    • Mooki

      True , just look at all those movies that got injected with the SJW illness. They all bomb.

      Its the media and hollywierd pretending and acting like it is the most popular thing but the reality of it is quite the opposite.

  • Grey

    “Parts of the manifesto broke our Code of Conduct. Which parts? We’re not going to say! Just trying talking about any of the topics raised in what Damore wrote and find out for yourself! It’s like a game. Pick right and we’ll allow you to talk (if you have the right opinions), pick wrong and you’re fired, burned in effigy on social media, and added to a open secret blacklist!”

    I’m just curious. Are any of the people who made Google into the power house it is today even still working there or is this just yet another case of a successful platform being colonized and subverted by faux-progressive authoritarians?

    • tajlund

      The founders themselves are SJW’s and have always been. Nothing has changed except instead of hiring based on skill, they now have these thought police tests through endless seminars and classes.

  • RichardGristle

    Fuck Google.

    Stop using Chrome.
    Stop using Gmail.
    Stop using Google search.

    There are scores of alternatives – and they all have more privacy to boot.

    • GuyGuysonEsquire

      DucksDucksGo, for example.

  • The other day, someone said that the SJW ship is sinking fast. I don’t think so.

    • RichardGristle

      I don’t think they’re losing any numbers over on the far left, but I do think the middle and right are gaining numbers way faster and thus alternate viewpoints are making a strong pushback.

  • Feli Aslan

    Luckily we germans already wrote the perfec ode to google decades ago:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZ3_d0unago

    • george orwell

      ^^^^ 1,000 up votes für dich

      • Feli Aslan

        The Problem with Orwell was that he is a british, which makes him maybe look white, but still more monkey than actual humans.

  • Kiryu

    Shocking,i’m surprised….not.

  • ThyPancakeConsumed

    They support discussion but fired guy who wrote paper that hurt their feelings.
    Official statements are filled with usual brain cells killing crap. They fired that guy, they hate people like me as well. I looking into alternatives to google and gmail starting today.

    • Mr.Towel

      DuckDuckGo is a decent search engine. ( https://duckduckgo.com/ )

      If you really need to use google’s search engine the best option is to use StartPage ( https://www.startpage.com/ ). It’s a search engine which proxys google’s metasearch results.

      For E-mail the best option is to pay for an e-mail service, but anything which isn’t google is good enough at this point.

      • ThyPancakeConsumed

        I knew about duckduckgo but didnt knew about paid email services.
        I appreciate your reply, thank you.

      • tajlund

        Not entirely true. Avoid Yahoo services like the plague, they are 1000% worse with virtue signaling than even Google. MSN isn’t much better.

        • Mr.Towel

          Well, it’s a generalization. I don’t think yahoo is actually worse, they only care less about hiding it. But true, they’re incredibly bad.

          I would still prefer people to use yahoo than google, for now. Simply because for the time being, Yahoo doesn’t have much power, Google’s power is way bigger and way more dangerous at the present.

          Going to yahoo will create the same google in the future but right now google is more deserving to have their pockets hemorrhaging, so I think anything not google is enough.

          To me, the best service right now is StartMail, but I know not everyone is up to pay 60 dollars a year only to have something they always had for free.

  • MONAD

    The reaction to this is going to finally wake people up. This will FUCK Google in the long run. After months, and months of speculation, they’ve FINALLY revealed themselves as the authoritarians they are. Hiding behind minorities in order to fuck people over. No. This is wrong. These people need to be sued and replaced.

    • The reaction to this is going to finally wake people up. This will FUCK Google in the long run.

      Nah, it won’t. I’ve seen exactly the same line you stated countless times over the last 5 years or so after every time there’s been a victim from the SJW/feminist bullying in a major company/organization/institution.

      Some people will be woken up, but all the normies, casuals, parents and hipster retards will be completely obvious to it all and will continue to use their Internet and Android services as if their lives depended on it.

      And then there’s the other problem of all the white-knights and gynocentrism retards.

      Hiding behind minorities in order to fuck people over.

      Always makes me laugh when they class women as “minorities” despite them being 50% of the earth’s human population and 51% of the voters.

      • Alistair

        and here the funny punchline 49% of NA women voted for trump.

    • Bitterbear

      Nope, will never happen. As long as people can fap to porn or use apps like Tinder, Grinder, etc. people will be content with what they have.

    • Disqusted

      People will probably just think “it’ll never happen to me”. That’s what they usually do.

      • ThyPancakeConsumed

        I call it “fire in the hole? Not in mine, never!” syndrome.

    • Alistair

      I dont want to be negative, because everything you say is right and I agree every one bit.

      but there is the “I dont care till it happen to me groups” the ones who watches porn as someone commented here.

      but for how long as new laws comes into force here in the UK.

      raging golden egale said it better in a vid.

      “once my battle is lost to dust, I be past caring” something like that meaning when our fight is over and the left moves on to its next target why should we be bother.

  • Lionhart16

    “The author had a right to express their views on those topics — we encourage an environment in which people can do this and it remains our policy to not take action against anyone for prompting these discussions.”

    You have the fucking GALL to say that, and then immediately have someone fired because of hurt feelings. I wonder when the day will come when that exact type of hypocrisy will bite you in the ass and make you wonder, “Gee, maybe if I stood up for others instead of burning them at the stake, I might not have ended up here right now.”

    • Phasmatis75

      Soon.
      They’ve pushed their paygap myth and then the US government checked and found out they were paying their women less. Instead of admitting that there was no paygap that people were paid what they were worth for the time they had invested in their careers they instead doubled down and refused to release their information on their employees which by contract they have to provide.

      As a result the department of labor has issued a statement saying Google should have it’s government contracts terminated, and they’re coming up for renewal here shortly.

      • Disqusted

        If there’s a paygap it always seems to be perpetrated by the rich SJW companies and criminals who are trying to push the paygap myth.

        Because regular people like us have to, you know, obey the f**king law.

        • tajlund

          Or Hillary who paid her female staffers something like 30% less than the men.

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. She goes in the rich SJW companies and criminals group. They know there isn’t a real wage gap, so they make it themselves.

            People don’t expect the people whining loudest about the wage gap to be the ones creating it. Same with all the other nasty shit, like trading pizza and hotdogs.

            They like to create situations where other people are expected to follow rules that they don’t, so they have an advantage and profit more.

          • tajlund

            Nah, Hillary has hit the point where she has gone so far past criminal she gets her own category, lol.

          • Disqusted

            To us, but sadly a bunch of people still don’t know she’s a criminal.

          • Disqusted

            To us, but sadly a bunch of people still don’t know she’s a criminal.

          • tajlund

            Nah, Hillary has hit the point where she has gone so far past criminal she gets her own category, lol.

          • tajlund

            My brothers adage still holds. Look to what they accuse others of to see what they are doing.

          • tajlund

            My brothers adage still holds. Look to what they accuse others of to see what they are doing.

          • Disqusted

            Yeah. She goes in the rich SJW companies and criminals group. They know there isn’t a real wage gap, so they make it themselves.

            People don’t expect the people whining loudest about the wage gap to be the ones creating it. Same with all the other nasty shit, like trading pizza and hotdogs.

            They like to create situations where other people are expected to follow rules that they don’t, so they have an advantage and profit more.

        • tajlund

          Or Hillary who paid her female staffers something like 30% less than the men.

      • durka durka

        this, adapocalypse and EU fines will hurt google.

    • Richard

      It sounds like the ex-employee has a retaliation and wrongful termination lawsuit to file against google.

  • Alistair

    It look like I was telling the truth to find the infidel within their rank.

    Do you believe the utther shite by google saying “first let me say we strongly support the rights of googles to express themselves” “and the memo is fair to debate”

    However it wasn’t fair enough eh google so you fire him it makes total sense (sarcasm).

    If it was fair and to be debated he could have stayed on this move shows clearly only to dam well you are a SJW cuck and more the reason to use the ad block on YouTube. And also use a different search engine.

  • Hawk Hopper

    Reading Pichai’s very public note was sickening. It’s two-faced to the extreme. “We encourage you to discuss these topics…but minorities were frightened, codes of conduct were broken and he needed to be fired…and we look forward to these discussions happening in the future.” It was pure corporate speak mixed with SJW virtue signaling.

    I have a feeling this memo was boosted specifically by Google to media outlets, so that they could clamp down on employees. It’s awfully suspicious that this happens a week after YouTube’s new “you didn’t break any of the rules, but we’re going to hide your content” announcement that was also blasted throughout media outlets. It’s as though Google wants to say, “If you don’t work for us, we’ll throttle you and if you do, get ready to be fired.”

    • If you don’t work for us, we’ll throttle you and if you do, get ready to be fired.”

      Pretty much… yep.

    • totenglocke

      He issued that statement in an attempt to get conservative employees to reveal themselves so that they can be purged.

      • The “Come out and surrender, we promise we’ll take you alive!” speech. If any of their Conservative employees fall for that trick they deserve to be fired. If they want to keep their jobs they’ll keep their head down low, leak stuff from the shadows and keep quiet.

        • durka durka

          You know its funny in countries that there was a civil war with nationalist and communists, the right side always took prisoners of war and put them in camps, the left side killed them all, their argument “well we didnt have any prisons to put them in so we killed them”

    • tajlund

      “We encourage you to discuss these topics…but minorities were
      frightened, codes of conduct were broken and he needed to be fired…and
      we look forward to these discussions happening in the future.”

      Of course they do, it tells them who to fire next.

    • tajlund

      “We encourage you to discuss these topics…but minorities were
      frightened, codes of conduct were broken and he needed to be fired…and
      we look forward to these discussions happening in the future.”

      Of course they do, it tells them who to fire next.

  • Raging Papist

    He needs to get a job at Gab, I believe they already reached out to him. Unfortunately, this was predictable because Google is wholly converged. Let this be a lesson to any moderate “classical liberal” who isn’t ready to throw down and fight the Left–they HATE you. Moderation is weakness because it shows you aren’t ready to fight (not committed). Everything he said was true, which shows that they are not reasonable. They despise reason.