The First Lawsuit has Been Filed Against CDPR

For a few weeks, several law firms have made headlines with their announcements that they are looking into suing CDPR for a multitude of reasons stemming from the company’s blatant false advertisement surrounding Cyberpunk 2077 and the subsequent stock devaluation that occurred when said false advertisements were discovered by the general populous. These allegations were later confirmed by CDPR themselves, who admitted they had intentionally misled consumers and their investors on the matter.

Keep in mind that suing a video game publisher or developer has been exceedingly difficult as the laws have yet to catch up with the software development industry. Any other industry, say automotive, were to conduct themselves in a similar fashion to the software industry, fines would be assessed, consumer lawsuits would be filed, investors would start votes of no confidence, and depending on the severity of the issue, people may go to prison. The last instance would be less applicable for the software industry unless said software resulted in fatalities or misleading statements were made to investors and security exchanges.

Most lawsuits fizzle out in court as defendants argue development is a challenging process with ups and downs. A process that, in the end, is unknowable how the end product will turn out. An argument that would never fly in the automotive industry if the brakes didn’t work, the speed-o-meter worked inconsistently, and the transmission sporadically died.

Despite a rock-solid case in most other industries, it was exceedingly unlikely any of these lawsuits would get off the ground. That was until the first was filed on the night before Christmas when The Rosen Law Firm out of L.A. filed a class-action lawsuit on behest of Andrew Trampe.

Said lawsuit goes further than naming the company itself to include several high-ranking employees directly engaged, according to the lawsuit, in fraudulent behaviors.

Nature of the Action

This is a class action on behalf of persons or entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded CD Projekt securities between January 16, 2020 and December 17, 2020, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Plaintiff seeks to recover compensable damages caused by Defendants’ violations of the federal securities laws under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act.


Plaintiff, as set forth in the accompanying Certification, purchased the Company’s securities at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period and was damaged upon the revelation of the alleged corrective disclosure.

Defendant CD Projekt, through its subsidiaries, engages in the development and digital distribution of videogames worldwide. It operates through two segments, CD PROJEKT RED and The Company’s product portfolio includes The Witcher; The Witcher 2: Assassins of Kings; The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hearts of Stone games, and Blood and Wine; Thronebreaker: The Witcher Tales; Gwent: The Witcher Card game; and Cyberpunk 2077, as well as online multiplayer games.

CD Projekt is incorporated in Delaware and its head office is located at Building E, ul. Jagiellonska 74, Warsaw 03-301, Poland. CD Projekt’s American Depository Receipts (“ADRs”) trade on the OTC Pink under the ticker symbol “OTGLY”, and its ordinary shares trade on the OTC Pink under the ticker symbol “OTGLF.”

Defendant Adam Michal Kicinski (“Kicinski”) has served as the Company’s Joint Executive Officer (“CEO”) and as President of the Management Board throughout the Class Period.

Defendant Piotr Marcin Nielubowicz (“Nielubowicz”) has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and Vice-President of the Management Board throughout the Class Period.

Defendant Michał Nowakowski (“Nowakowski”) has served as the vice president of business development and member of the Management Board throughout the Class Period.

Defendants Kicinski, Nielubowicz, and Nowakowski are sometimes referred to herein as the “Individual Defendants.”

Each of the Individual Defendants:

(a) directly participated in the management of the Company;

(b) was directly involved in the day-to-day operations of the Company at the highest levels;

(c) was privy to confidential proprietary information concerning the Company and its business and operations;

(d) was directly or indirectly involved in drafting, producing, reviewing and/or disseminating the false and misleading statements and information alleged herein;

(e) was directly or indirectly involved in the oversight or implementation of the Company’s internal controls;

(f) was aware of or recklessly disregarded the fact that the false and misleading statements were being issued concerning the Company; and/or

(g) approved or ratified these statements in violation of the federal securities laws.

The Company is liable for the acts of the Individual Defendants and its employees under the doctrine of respondeat superior and common law principles of agency because all of the wrongful acts complained of herein were carried out within the scope of their employment.

The scienter of the Individual Defendants and other employees and agents of the Company is similarly imputed to the Company under respondeat superior and agency principles

The Company and the Individual Defendants are referred to herein, collectively, as the “Defendants.”

The lawsuit itself is an interesting read by itself, but it merely sums up what has been in the public sphere and likely what you’ve heard from your favorite YouTuber. Crucial to the discussion, the lawsuit lays as its foundation both the lies and how the eventual truth came out and was admitted to by CDPR, which will render the lawsuit difficult to contest on the grounds of illegitimacy.

The Truth Emerges

The Company launched Cyberpunk 2077 on December 10, 2020. Consumers soon discovered that the Current-Generation Console versions of Cyberpunk 2077 were error-laden and difficult to play. IGN published a scathing review, stating that the Console versions “fail[] to hit even the lowest bar of technical quality one should expect even when playing on lower-end hardware. [Cyberpunk 2077] performs so poorly that it makes combat, driving, and what is otherwise a master craft of storytelling legitimately difficult to look at.”

On December 14, 2020, facing criticisms for delivering an unplayable, bug-ridden product on the Consoles, the Company held a conference call. During the call, Defendant Kicinski called the Current-Generation Console versions “way below our expectations,” and stated the following:

“After 3 delays, we as the Management Board were too focused on releasing the game. We underestimated the scale and complexity of the issues, we ignored the signals about the need for additional time to refine the game on the base last-gen consoles. It was the wrong approach and against our business philosophy. On top of that, during the campaign, we showed the game mostly on PCs.”

During that same call, Defendant Nielubowicz stated “we definitely did not spend enough time looking at that,” when referring to issues with the Current-Generation Console versions


CDPR has announced they will fight the class action, but with stock value falling, this matter will likely resolve in an out of court settlement. CDPR’s previously legal litigation with the Witcher Series creator after they breached the contract with the development of a 4th game resulted in an out of court settlement that saw money and rights change hands.

With mounting pressure, this issue will likely similarly resolve itself, but that is to be seen. Lawsuits against the software industry are difficult to fight, so CDPR may have a better position legally than anticipated.

Apple Announces Percentage Structure for Small Businesses

Apple has made headlines with the announcement of two significant changes coming to their Appstore. Come January, Apple will launch a small business program that will implement a new percentage program for its Appstore. Apple’s CEO issued the following statement with the announcement of the new program.

Continue reading “Apple Announces Percentage Structure for Small Businesses”

Editorial: Epic Wins Their Temporary Restraining Order Rendering the Courts the New Central Planners

Buckle in and sit down, for it is time for a lesson in liberty. This has become a necessity to remedy an ongoing misconception that continues to permeate our comment section from our more vocal critics. These critics have alleged in my coverage of the Apple/Epic lawsuit that I have defended Apple against Epic. In doing so, I have unveiled some unsavory nature to my character. Continue reading “Editorial: Epic Wins Their Temporary Restraining Order Rendering the Courts the New Central Planners”

Tim Sweeney Misportrays Apple’s Statements

At present, Tim Sweeney is attempting to mislead his audience regarding discoveries that Epic requested a special exemption from Apple’s terms of service, as to allow them to implement their separate payment system. In line with his current persona of the champion of the little guy, he is claiming Apple is attempting to mislead people and that they asked for exceptions for everyone. Continue reading “Tim Sweeney Misportrays Apple’s Statements”

Apple Issues a Rebuttal To Epics Temporary Restraining Order

Earlier this week, Epic Games filed for a temporary restraining order to prevent Apple from removing Fortnite from the App Store and prevent the company from terminating their developer’s account along with access to developer tools the company needs to develop the Unreal Engine for iOS. On Friday, Apple’s legal team filed their counter-motion for the dismissal of the motion for the temporary restraining order. Continue reading “Apple Issues a Rebuttal To Epics Temporary Restraining Order”

Apple Terminates Epic Games Development Account

As previously reported, Apple and Epic are currently engaged in a legal battle over ownership and control of private ecosystems. Wherein Apple maintains they have a right to control their private ecosystem, whereas Epic is alleging permitting them to do so is a violation of the Sherman Act. Continue reading “Apple Terminates Epic Games Development Account”

Patreon Loses Lawsuit Costing The Company Millions

If you haven’t been following the news, as reported on, here is a quick recap of events that have lead to Patreon losing a court battle and now being forced to enter into arbitration with over a hundred backers: This all started when Patreon decided to deplatform conservative comedian Owen Benjamin. Continue reading “Patreon Loses Lawsuit Costing The Company Millions”

Gamer Who Was Banned From His Steam Library Takes Case To Consumer Protection Agency


We recently reported on a Russian Steam user who was unceremoniously banned from accessing his account, both in the community forums and from his game library through the Steam client. He recently decided to take his issue up with the consumer rights agency in Russia, as well as look into suing Valve for breaching Russian law. Continue reading “Gamer Who Was Banned From His Steam Library Takes Case To Consumer Protection Agency”

Gearbox Sues 3D Realms Over Alleged Breach of Contract in the Duke Nukem Sale

Gearbox Software has formally filed suit against the owner of 3D Realms, Apogee Software. The suit alleges Apogee breached contract when they failed to deliver the Duke Nukem intellectual property free and clear in 2009. Their filing also claims Apogee Software failed to honor the indemnity clause as well. Continue reading “Gearbox Sues 3D Realms Over Alleged Breach of Contract in the Duke Nukem Sale”

Judge Rules Switch Joy-Con Drift Case Must Be Arbitrated

District Court Judge Gary Feinerman, on Thursday, May 21 rendered a ruling in the litigation brought against Nintendo over their consoles Joy-Con drift defect. Though the courts recognize the issue does exist, the Judge has ruled the issue must be arbitrated, not litigated. Continue reading “Judge Rules Switch Joy-Con Drift Case Must Be Arbitrated”

Judge BTFOs Bogus Woman Soccer Lawsuit

March 2019 saw female soccer players file a joint lawsuit against their employer United States Soccer Federation Incorporated. Claiming both pay and accommodations disparity compared to their male counterparts who are employed by the same company. The two principle arguments presented for their case were the female team performed better than their male counterparts yet were paid less and Equal Pay Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 had been violated during their employment. Continue reading “Judge BTFOs Bogus Woman Soccer Lawsuit”

Activision Subpoenas Reddit To Identify Call Of Duty: Warzone Leaker

While Take-Two Interactive and Rockstar have lawyers going after modders for “obscene sexual content” in an M-rated game, we now have Activision sending Reddit a subpoena to find the person responsible behind the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare “Warzone” leak. Continue reading “Activision Subpoenas Reddit To Identify Call Of Duty: Warzone Leaker”

Lawsuit Against Nintendo’s Lack Of eShop Refunds Dismissed

Nintendo Lawsuit

Judge Isabel Jahn from the German court presiding over the case against Nintendo for not offering eShop refunds dismissed the lawsuit recently. Nintendo Everything picked up the news from Norwegian outlet Press Fire, who reported that the case was dismissed because Nintendo’s defense that the no-refund policy of the Nintendo eShop complies with European Union laws. Continue reading “Lawsuit Against Nintendo’s Lack Of eShop Refunds Dismissed”